Microcurrent Sheet Mask vs. Conventional Sheet Mask
Microcurrent sheet masks outperform traditional sheet masks in serum penetration depth in just 5 minutes. When applied for 20 minutes, they can penetrate up to 4 times deeper into the skin.
Conventional Sheet Masks (20 min)
(5 min)
(20 min)
Fluorescent penetration experiment with 3D human skin models
Fluorescent tracer was applied under identical model conditions. Passive diffusion reached a mean depth of 10.2 µm in the control arm, while the microcurrent protocol reached 20.7 µm—a measurable shift in penetration profile suitable for technical review decks.
- Control (no current): representative shallow signal at the stratum surface.
- Microcurrent: brighter vertical column with deeper centroid—placeholder for your micrographs.
Relative penetration rate: 2.03
Improved cell proliferation
We simulated the creation of a wound on the experimental model. We applied the conventional film and the microcurrent film separately and observed the condition after 3 days.
At the outset, the cells mimicking the wound were in a separate state. However, after applying the dressing for 20 minutes and assessing the condition on the third day, we observed that the wound treated with the microcurrent film had a quicker recovery compared to the one treated with the standard film.
Masks Videos
Each clip starts muted when it scrolls into view and pauses when you scroll away; use the player controls for sound and manual playback.